A quite interesting paper by RAND: Blinders, Blunders and Wars
The document points out that strategic blunders — serious missteps with unintended negative consequences — often stem from leaders relying on oversimplified or flawed mental models to navigate complex decisions. These distorted models, far removed from objective reality, lead decision-makers to dismiss or misconstrue critical information, lean on intuition over analysis, and display unwarranted self-confidence.
Key factors that contribute to such blunders include:
1. Filtering or manipulating information: Leaders tend to interpret information in ways that confirm their pre-existing beliefs, discarding facts that don’t fit into their set narrative or strategy.
2. Overreliance on intuition and experience: Data and analysis that could challenge the leader’s perspective are given little weight, favoring gut instincts instead.
3. Arrogance and hubris: Unwarranted confidence in their abilities can lead leaders to underestimate risks or overlook potential challenges in the situation.
4. Rigid and flawed strategic concepts: Leaders can become dogmatic about their strategic vision, reducing flexibility in considering alternative scenarios.
5. Underestimating the enemy’s will and capabilities: Many blunders arise from misjudging the resilience or competence of an adversary.
6. Suppression of dissent and debate: In environments where debate is discouraged, critical voices are stifled, reducing opportunities to course-correct.
To avoid these errors, the document suggests enhancing the use of information and strengthening internal debate. Proposed solutions include creating independent institutions or advisory sources, capable of offering unbiased perspectives and with direct access to decision-makers, ensuring a check on overconfidence and promoting sounder strategic thinking.
Follow